Level II Ethics item sets

    The Code and Standards applied to whole firms: several people, several decisions, one case.

    Try a question
    10–15%
    of the exam
    2–3
    Ethics sets on exam day
    12 min
    per item set of 4 questions
    45%
    passed Level II in Aug 2026

    What gets tested

    Expect a firm, a few CFA members and decisions to judge, often under more than one Standard.

    • Standards I–VII in context

      Gifts, material nonpublic information, fair dealing and suitability, unfolding over several paragraphs.

    • Violation or just weak practice

      Tell what a Standard actually requires apart from what only sounds most ethical.

    • Policies that prevent problems

      Recommend the procedure a firm should adopt so the violation does not happen again.

    Where candidates lose points

    Choosing the answer that sounds most ethical instead of the one a specific Standard requires, and missing the sentence late in the case that changes the facts, such as a disclosure, a fee arrangement or who paid for a trip.

    How it differs from Level I

    Level I asks whether a short scenario breaks a Standard. Level II gives you a whole firm and asks you to judge several people's conduct, often under more than one Standard at once.

    Level I Ethical and Professional Standards practice questions

    Try one

    A real Level II question is part of a longer case. Here's a short slice of one.

    An analyst visited the mine, built a detailed model, listed his assumptions and kept his notes on file. His published report then says:

    Report wording"The share price will fall 20%"
    Model and assumptionsIncluded
    Notes and modelKept in research files

    The sentence about the share price most likely violates the Standard relating to:

    Try the full set free →

    Free Ethical and Professional Standards item set

    An original case written by CFAQuiz on issuer-paid travel, the mosaic theory, allocation of an oversubscribed offering and how forecasts are presented in research. Read the case, answer the four questions, then open the explanations.

    TOPIC: ETHICAL AND PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS

    Westbrook Partners

    0/4Exam pace 12:00

    Daniel Okafor, CFA, is a mining analyst at Westbrook Partners, an investment management firm that runs discretionary equity portfolios for pension plans, charities and wealthy families. Okafor's research is used by Westbrook Partners' portfolio managers and is also sent to clients who subscribe to the firm's research service. Sofia Brandt, CFA, is Westbrook Partners' chief compliance officer. Leo Marsh, CFA, is a portfolio manager who uses Okafor's research.

    In March, Halden Mining, a listed copper producer that Okafor covers, invites him to tour its new mine in northern Chile. The invitation says that Halden Mining will fly a small group of analysts there on the company's private jet and pay for three nights at a resort near the mine, including golf and a spa programme. Analysts may bring a spouse at the company's expense. Commercial flights to the region are available, but the journey would take a day longer. Okafor tells his manager about the trip, accepts the full package and takes his wife. He does not ask Westbrook Partners to pay for any part of the trip, and the firm does not have a policy on issuer-paid travel.

    During the tour, Halden Mining's managers answer only questions that relate to information already in the company's public filings. Okafor notices that the processing plant appears to be running well below capacity and that several haul trucks are parked in a maintenance yard. In the town near the mine, he talks to the owner of a supply business, who says that orders from the mine have slowed. Okafor combines these observations with a public industry report on lower ore grades in the region and with Halden Mining's published production guidance. He concludes that the company is likely to miss its guidance for the year, and he lowers his rating from Buy to Hold. No one at Halden Mining tells him anything about production that has not been made public.

    Okafor's report states: "Halden Mining's share price will fall 20% by the end of the year as production disappoints." The report includes a detailed model, a description of his site visit, a list of the key assumptions and a section on risks. Okafor keeps his notes and the model in the firm's research files.

    In May, Westbrook Partners receives an allocation of shares in an oversubscribed initial public offering by a lithium producer. The allocation is much smaller than the amount the firm requested. Marsh decides that the shares are suitable for all twelve of the accounts he manages that are permitted to hold small-cap resource stocks. Because the allocation is small, he gives all of the shares to the three largest of those accounts, which pay the highest fees, saying that splitting the shares across twelve accounts would make each position too small to matter. One of the three large accounts belongs to Marsh's father, who has been a fee-paying client for many years and whose account is managed under the same mandate and fee schedule as other clients' accounts.

    Brandt reviews the year's activity. She notes that Westbrook Partners has written policies on the allocation of trades and on research, but that the allocation policy only says that "allocations must be fair" and does not explain how to allocate shares when an offering is oversubscribed. She wants to update the policy so that all portfolio managers apply the same method in future and so that clients can be told how allocations are made.

    Brandt also plans to write guidance on issuer-paid travel and on how analysts should present forecasts in research reports. She asks Okafor to review the draft before it is sent to the firm's staff, because he is the analyst who travels most often to visit companies. Okafor says he is happy to help and suggests that the guidance should include examples of trips that would and would not be acceptable.

    Report an issue with this set

    How it works

    Three steps, on the real exam timing.

    1. Read the case

      A vignette and exhibits, like the exam.

    2. Answer against the clock

      Four questions, about 12 minutes a set.

    3. Review what you missed

      Every option explained, with the mistake behind each wrong answer.

    Level II plans

    Prices include VAT. Monthly, cancel anytime. Start on the free plan if you like.

    Basic

    €24.95/ month

    • Unlimited item set practice, by topic
    • Full 22-set mock exams with the real timing
    • Worked explanation for every question
    • Progress tracking
    • Review mode: every question you miss, plus your bookmarks
    Choose Basic
    Most popular

    Pro

    €34.95/ month

    • Everything in Basic
    • AI tutor chat on every question, with the case in view
    • Follow-up questions until it clicks
    • Priority support
    Choose Pro

    Ethical and Professional Standards questions

    How much of the CFA Level II exam is Ethical and Professional Standards?

    CFA Institute gives Ethical and Professional Standards a weight of 10-15% of the Level II exam. That is about 2-3 of the 22 item sets.

    Are these real CFA Level II questions?

    No. CFA Institute does not release past exams. CFAQuiz item sets are original and mapped to the 2026 Level II learning outcome statements.

    Keep practising Level II

    Create a free account to save your progress, or compare the Level II plans.

    CFAQuiz is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to CFA Institute. CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned by CFA Institute.